Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Triangle Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents and council spar over 'triangle' development, environmental review requested
Summary
Public commenters and council members debated a proposed 'triangle' development site: residents urged environmental testing and preservation of green space while proponents pushed retail/commercial plans; council encouraged civil discourse and noted the need for future formal agenda items and studies.
A heated public comment period at the St. Francis Common Council on June 22 centered on competing visions for a parcel residents call the 'triangle' and calls for environmental review before any development.
Christine Cornac urged an independent environmental study of soil toxins, noting the last site survey dated to 2005: “I respectfully request that the council do an independent environmental study on the soil toxins before we even develop the triangle,” she said.
Opposing speakers argued in favor of development. Marty Sahorski told the council his group had gathered more than 700 petitions in support of retail and commercial development on the triangle, and suggested the project could support city services through new tax revenues.
Council members repeatedly asked for measured conversation and said decisions about development will come through formal agenda processes. Council President Brickner and other members urged residents and councilors to remain respectful and to use established public meetings to air evidence and proposals.
Practical next steps mentioned during the meeting included requests for environmental testing, further agenda items to review development proposals, and continued public engagement. No environmental study or formal development approval was directed by the council at the June 22 meeting.
Ending: The council closed public discussion for the evening and indicated future formal consideration will be required before policy or approvals move forward.
