Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission backs distribution of Book Five housing draft, asks staff to soften 'recruit developers' language
Summary
The Planning Commission voted 5–2 to recommend distribution of the Book Five housing draft for a 63-day public comment period while directing staff and consultants to soften repeated references to "recruiting developers," after commissioners debated tone and strategy for future outreach.
Get email alerts on the Housing Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
On June 17 the Walker Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Commission proceed to distribute the Book Five draft (the housing element of the master plan) and to begin the state-required 63-day public comment period. The commission instructed the planning director to work with consultants to soften language that repeatedly references "recruiting developers."
Planning Director Paula Preibisch walked commissioners through the draft’s executive summary, needs assessment and an action plan that targets 1,500 housing units over the next 15 years. Staff described the action items as tailored by subarea and emphasized that recruitment efforts would vary by site type (e.g., Greenfield parcels vs. gentle-density infill).
Several commissioners raised concerns that the phrase "recruit developers" — used across multiple subarea action items — sounded overly aggressive and might give the impression the city would actively market or subsidize development. Commissioners suggested alternative wording such as "inform," "market to developers," or "create opportunity awareness" and asked staff to clarify that outreach would be measured and tailored rather than a blanket campaign.
Commissioner Rob moved that the Planning Commission recommend distribution of the draft and direct the planning director to work with consultants to soften the recruitment language; Pat supported the motion. The motion passed 5–2, with Tom and Mark recorded as opposed. Staff said the comment window will allow continued refinement and that final adoption would occur only after the public comment period and any necessary revisions.
Next steps: If the City Commission approves distribution, staff will post the draft for the 63-day comment period, solicit feedback from neighboring jurisdictions and partners, and return to the Planning Commission with consultant-proposed language edits prior to any final adoption vote.

