Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Small Lot Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
PLDRC denies narrow‑lot variance after neighbors raise septic and property‑value concerns
Summary
Commissioners voted 4‑2 to deny a request to reduce a side setback from 8 ft to 6 ft on a recently combined narrow lot; neighbors cited septic‑separation and long‑term neighborhood impacts and asked the commission to preserve established lot patterns.
The Planning and Land Development Regulation Commission on June 18, 2026, denied a variance request to reduce the west side yard setback on a narrow lot after neighbors raised sustained objections about septic‑system separation, aquifer impacts and property values.
Applicant Rafael Gurion asked to reduce the west side yard from 8 ft to 6 ft to place a two‑story single‑family residence on a lot created through recent lot combinations. Staff recommended approval, finding that the request met three of five variance criteria and that practical constraints (a large Duke Energy easement on the east side of the lot) limited buildable area.
Neighbors, including David and Laura Flowers, urged the commission to reject authorization for a 25‑ft‑wide buildable footprint, arguing that historically the parcel was considered unbuildable and that adding narrow lots risks septic‑system crowding and erosion of neighborhood character. "I can't believe I'm here for a 25‑ft lot," David Flowers said, adding concerns about maintenance of septic systems and adjacent property values.
Commissioners split on whether staff provided sufficient evidence that the property’s conditions were unique and not self‑inflicted; one motion to approve the variances failed 2‑4 and a subsequent motion to deny carried 4‑2. Commissioner Bush explained she could not support a 2‑ft relaxation given available buildable alternatives and the lack of compelling hardship evidence.
The denial preserves the current setback standard for the parcel. The applicant may revise his design or seek a continuance to provide additional technical evidence if he wishes to pursue the relief again.
