Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Elections topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Lincoln County commissioners remove election judge after social-media conduct; staff urge clear standards

Lincoln County Board of Commissioners · May 27, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commissioners voted to remove an election judge after county elections staff reported social-media posts that compromised neutrality. Elections staff urged consistent application across judges and called for clearer written standards; commissioners asked staff for documentation and legal review before further removals.

Lincoln County commissioners voted May 27 to remove an election judge after county elections staff reported social-media posts and emails that officials said undermined neutrality in a heated local race.

County elections staff described posts they characterized as "bullying" toward a candidate and said similar conduct by two other judges may exist. An elections staff member told the commission the removed judge had undergone extensive training and that any removals should be applied consistently; staff asked commissioners to review documentation before acting on additional complaints.

Commissioners said election judges occupy a public-facing, quasi-official role and must maintain neutrality. Commissioner comments emphasized that while First Amendment rights protect private speech, judges have an obligation to avoid conduct that could disenfranchise voters or create a perception of bias. An HR-experienced public speaker cautioned that clear written policy and documented progressive-discipline steps are important to withstand legal challenge.

The motion to remove the named election judge was moved, seconded and approved by voice vote at the meeting. Commissioners instructed elections staff to forward any documentation on the two additional judges so the board could consider consistency and legal process. Commissioners also discussed drafting clear guidance or a handbook for appointed election judges and seeking legislative clarification if necessary.

What happens next: the removed judge will be notified; staff will provide the commission with evidence regarding any additional judges under review and work on clear standards for conduct and removal procedures.