Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pier Condition topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Select Board accepts pier condition report, opts for spot repairs over expansion
Summary
The Select Board accepted a consultant report that found isolated soft spots but no evidence of widespread failure at the town pier and voted to maintain and repair the existing structure rather than pursue immediate expansion.
The Select Board accepted a consultant condition report on the town pier and agreed that the structure is generally serviceable, recommending targeted spot repairs rather than a comprehensive rebuild or near-term extension.
Brian (Presenter) summarized the technical findings, saying the study relied chiefly on seismic testing. “So mostly you’re talking about the red lines are the seismic information,” he said, and added that ground-penetrating radar produced limited results “because of the salt water and tide levels.” He described bedrock indicators near the pier end and estimated bedrock depths roughly 22 to 40 feet below the surface.
On material condition, Brian told members the tests showed isolated patches of less-consolidated material, not pervasive failure. “I think the bottom line is that we just keep doing spot work to fix it,” he said, and recommended targeted injections or local repairs rather than removing and rebuilding the pier.
A board member moved to accept the consultant report and to recommend maintaining the pier’s serviceable condition; the motion was seconded and approved by voice/hand. The transcript does not record who moved or seconded the motion.
Board members and staff discussed related items: the pier surface is patched asphalt in places and staff will consult Ben to confirm the last resurfacing date. Town staff said sewer parts for new portable restrooms are on site and that final power and sewer connections remain to be completed before the restrooms are used.
Members noted that past attempts to extend the pier failed because fill material “disappeared,” and they said more intrusive testing (sounding or core drilling) would be required to evaluate any future expansion — work that would fall outside this study’s scope. Warrant articles for pier-related work have been written and submitted for town meeting; during the discussion someone stated “That’s 400, but that’s with a 15% contingency, which is about $50,000,” but the speaker did not specify units in the provided transcript excerpt.
Next steps: the board accepted the report and its maintenance recommendation; any decision to pursue deeper geotechnical work or pier expansion would require additional studies and future approvals at town meeting.
