Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Achievement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Molalla River SD 35 reports large elementary reading gains but falls short of ambitious 70% goal
Summary
District leaders reported substantial spring gains on national-referenced assessments: third-grade students above the national median rose from about 34.8% in the fall to roughly 60% in spring; K'5 reading above the national average rose from 41% to 56%. The board was urged to publicize successes while continuing targeted tutoring and professional development.
The Molalla River School District 35 presented end-of-year scorecard results showing substantial elementary reading gains while acknowledging the district did not meet an ambitious 70% target.
District leaders told the board that about 34.78% of third graders were above the 50th national percentile at fall baseline; by spring roughly 60% of third graders scored above that same national median. For fifth grade, the district reported a rise from roughly 36% in the fall to about 55% in spring. At the K'5 level, the percentage of students reading above the national average rose from about 41% at the beginning of the year to 56% at year'end.
The district framed the results within a 45-day KPI cycle and a red/yellow/green review process, but reminded the board that final year reporting is binary: goals are reported as met (green) or not met (red). Presenters emphasized that "red" does not necessarily mean failure but signals a need to adopt, adjust, or abandon strategies.
School leaders attributed gains to a set of coordinated actions: earlier, higher-dosage tutoring; a districtwide focus on the science of reading; peer-led professional development and grade-level teams that meet monthly to compare data and adopt successful practices; use of multiple assessments (a comprehension measure and DIBELS for foundational skills); and targeted interventions that reduced the percentage of students needing intensive supports. The district reported a 12 percentage-point drop (from 39% to 27%) in students needing intensive support on the DIBELS measure and a 7-point drop in those needing strategic support (24% to 17%).
Board members pressed for clarification when presenters used the phrase "34.78% above the national average," and staff clarified that the figure refers to the share of students performing above the 50th percentile on the referenced assessment, not to an average score. Presenters said they did not plan to share raw score metrics at the meeting but offered to provide further detail later.
A district presenter described a classroom-level example in which one teacher's cohort moved from 4% above the national median in the fall to roughly 90% in spring after targeted instructional changes; the board suggested documenting such practices in a white paper for other districts.
The presentation concluded with next steps: codifying high-dosage tutoring earlier in the year, continuing structured professional development around the science of reading, expanding districtwide grade-level collaboration, and better communicating results to families and the community. The board encouraged staff to highlight these gains through district communications while the district refines data collection and measurement for future reporting.
