Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solid Waste Financing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Park County solid waste board weighs $400k–$700k in site upgrades, grants and a possible rate increase
Summary
Board members discussed financing site improvements and compactors, explored limited grant options, cited a potential $100,000 diesel budget shortfall and the possibility of a $10-per-tag rate increase to build reserves; staff will draft a public participation plan and present a budget and recommendations next month.
Board members and county public works staff spent the May 21 meeting outlining options to finance multi-site upgrades, compactors and related operational changes to Park County's solid-waste program.
Public works staff told the board the program would likely need between $400,000 and $700,000 to begin purchasing compactors and equipment for five sites. "We probably need to raise between 400 and 700,000 before we kick this thing off," a board member summarized during the discussion.
Staff said current reserves include roughly $100,000 carried over from last year but flagged near-term pressures: diesel fuel costs are expected to be substantially over budget and staff included an additional $100,000 in the draft to cover diesel. The public works director said the department could propose a $10-per-tag increase to build reserves for multi-year improvements, while board members weighed whether to absorb higher fuel and recycling costs or raise rates to accelerate upgrades.
Grant and financing options were discussed but described as limited for traditional solid-waste projects. Staff noted some programs are tangential (for example, green-energy grants that could subsidize electric trucks) and that historically bridge projects have been prioritized by certain state funds. The board discussed the Burlington Northern (BN) settlement fund—money the county received after contamination related to landfill operations—as a possible source of interest or a loan model, but several members counseled caution because monitoring and environmental obligations remain for decades.
On project timing, staff said improvements could take three or more years to assemble funding and several additional years to implement. The board asked staff to adapt the county planning department's public outreach approach to develop a public participation plan for solid-waste site changes and directed staff to return next month with draft budget figures and a presentation.
Department reports: staff reported metal-recycling bid results that should lower costs (per-ton credits and sharply reduced container rent), advertised cardboard recycling bids opening in early June, and raised the option of ending plastic recycling at some sites to reduce costs while keeping can recycling where it generates revenue.
Next steps: staff will draft a public participation plan, return with a budget presentation at the next meeting and continue pursuing grant and internal loan options.
