Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Alternative Teaching Certificate topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee narrows alternative teaching certificate timeline, adds IDEA supervision requirements

Certification Advisory Committee · November 5, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee recommended changes to R72614E that shorten initial issuance of the Alternative Teaching Certificate to one year (with up to two one‑year extensions), add IDEA‑aligned training and supervision requirements for special education teachers, and clarify enrollment and extension timelines; staff will forward recommendations to the board.

The Certification Advisory Committee on Nov. 5 voted to recommend multiple substantive and technical revisions to rule R72614E governing the Alternative Teaching Certificate.

Department staff explained the proposal’s central changes: shift the initial issuance to one year with two possible one‑year extensions (three years total), align special education teacher supervision and training with IDEA requirements, clarify that certificate holders must be enrolled in a board‑approved educator preparation program while teaching, and set extension‑application timelines (within three months before expiration and no later than six months after expiration). "We are proposing that the alternative teaching certificate be issued for one year and may be extended one year two times," staff told the committee.

Staff also summarized stakeholder outreach: 128 stakeholders were invited to a stakeholder meeting on Oct. 20 with 95 attendees; a survey produced roughly 42 responses plus additional submissions. Responses were largely supportive but raised operational questions about how LEAs and educator preparation programs would satisfy supervision and monitoring requirements. Committee members pressed for data on how many educators currently hold alternative certificates and how district staffing practices will interact with the change; staff cited 2024 dashboard figures (examples included 472 alt elementary K–8 and 612 alt secondary certificate holders) and said the department will update its 2025 dashboard.

Several members noted the policy tradeoffs for rural districts and for special education placements. The committee approved the recommendation by voice vote after Member Janice Panel moved and Member Lighting seconded the motion.

Why it matters: the change shortens the initial authorization window and formalizes supervision requirements intended to ensure alignment with federal IDEA standards for special education teachers, while creating a transition and monitoring process between LEAs and educator preparation programs.

What’s next: the department will forward the recommended language to the board for the formal rulemaking steps and update dashboards and stakeholder guidance as implementation tools.