Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Noise topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Seaside amends noise rules for permitted business activities after heated public debate
Summary
Council approved an amendment clarifying that noises accessory to permitted businesses should be evaluated against objective zoning decibel standards rather than the subjective 9.12 nuisance standard. Residents near music venues raised concerns, especially about low-frequency bass and enforcement.
Seaside’s City Council voted 4–1 on June 18 to amend the municipal noise code to clarify that noises accessory to permitted commercial uses are judged under the zoning code’s quantitative decibel standards rather than the subjective nuisance standard of chapter 9.12.
Staff (Andrew Mrick, housing and planning manager) said the change aligns municipal code with established zoning procedures and ensures businesses operating under a valid permit will be held to measurable decibel thresholds. The amendment leaves enforcement authority intact: if a permitted operation exceeds the zoning decibel limits, enforcement actions remain possible.
The item drew extensive public comment from neighbors of local music venues, especially one identified by speakers as Deja Blue. Residents described persistent low‑frequency bass that they say travels through walls and lodging, and questioned whether A‑weighted decibel measures capture the bass impact. They urged the council and staff to ensure enforcement tools address frequency, duration and repeated disturbance.
City staff and the police noted complaints have been investigated and the venue’s use permit remains in effect; staff said it has not been found in violation of the municipal code but encouraged residents to continue filing complaints to generate evidence for enforcement. The city attorney and staff noted the change does not remove the ability to enforce decibel limits and that code enforcement remains the complaint pathway.
Council members debated the risk of appearing to give businesses too broad a pass, and one council member voted no, saying the amendment could reduce neighbor protections. The measure passed 4–1.
Council directed staff to ensure clearer guidance on how noise complaints are investigated and to provide additional public information about measurement methods and enforcement pathways.
Outcome: ordinance amendment approved on second reading; staff to report back on implementation and enforcement guidance.
