Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Rates topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Campbellsville council approves water and sewer rates after debate over automatic 3%
Summary
After debate over an automatic 3% annual increase, the Campbellsville City Council approved ordinance 26-01 setting water and sewer rates; the vote was 9–2. Members cited rising costs and capital needs while some opposed locking an automatic increase into ordinance language.
Get email alerts on the Water Rates topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Campbellsville — The City Council approved ordinance 26-01 setting water and sewer rates on June 15, 2026, after a heated discussion about whether to retain an automatic 3% annual increase in the ordinance. The roll-call vote recorded nine in favor and two opposed.
The measure clears rates for the coming year; councilmembers who supported the ordinance said a modest automatic increase avoids sudden, larger hikes and helps maintain the utility’s finances. Opponents pressed for more written financial detail and argued the council should not embed a mandatory percentage into ordinance language without additional review. Councilmember AJ voted against the measure, stating, “No, because it’s the 3%.”
Speakers noted the water committee reviews rates in the spring and submits recommendations, and councillors urged that a member of the water board present detailed numbers when recommending increases. Staff and other participants said the automatic provision was adopted previously by a past administration to provide predictable revenue and to satisfy bond and grant-related expectations tied to projects such as the Batesville water tank.
Council discussion included larger capital needs: one participant said the city’s sewer plant could require a roughly $10 million repair and referenced state funding the city has received (discussed in the meeting as $15 million and another $6.1 million) that help offset capital borrowing needs. Supporters of the ordinance cited those funding pressures as a reason to keep incremental rate adjustments rather than deferring larger increases.
After debate, the council proceeded to a roll-call vote. Votes recorded: Jacob yes; Deanna yes; John yes; Jimmy yes; Faith yes; AJ no; Stan no; Kathy yes; Adonnie yes; Sharon yes; Heather yes. The motion carried.
The council indicated it may revisit the question of whether to retain or remove the automatic 3% in a separate ordinance discussion; the immediate vote addressed rates for the coming fiscal year.

