Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Housing Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Central District shows interest in exploring narrower ADU setbacks on narrow lots

Central District Neighborhood Meeting · June 17, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

David Hardy proposed pursuing reduced ADU setbacks to expand owner‑occupied accessory dwelling options on narrow lots; the neighborhood voted (22–7) to ask planners and councilors to explore options, while residents urged attention to parking and enforcement risks.

David Hardy presented an idea to the Central District: consider reducing the 10‑foot ADU setback to a smaller distance (for example five feet) on narrow lots so more owner‑occupied accessory dwelling units (ADUs) can be added without changing neighborhood character. Hardy framed ADUs as "the unicorn of housing," saying owner‑occupied ADUs can provide homeowner income, support aging in place and increase housing supply while preserving streetscapes.

Attendees raised concerns including the potential conversion of ADUs into duplexes or absentee rental properties, additional on‑street parking pressure, and property‑value impacts. Several residents said enforcement of owner‑occupancy and parking restrictions has been uneven and urged stronger code compliance and permitting requirements. Supporters noted precedents where small setbacks (as little as three feet) have worked in older neighborhoods and suggested pairing any setback change with stronger parking and enforcement measures.

The district held an advisory vote on whether to pursue a review with planners and council members; the moderator recorded 22 in favor and 7 opposed. The vote does not change code; it directed the neighborhood board to pursue further conversations with planning staff and councilors about potential targeted amendments for narrow lots.

Next steps: neighborhood board will seek meetings with planning staff and interested council members to scope potential code amendments and enforcement mechanisms.