Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Grading Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves revised late‑work and make‑up policy after debate on evidence‑based grading

Rapid City Area Schools Board of Education · June 16, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After discussion about consistency across high schools and evidence‑based grading, the board approved a revision to the district's late assignments and make‑up work policy, moving late‑work deadlines to quarter or term instead of semester.

The Rapid City Area Schools Board approved a revision to its late assignments and make‑up work policy following discussion about grading practices and consistency across the district.

Board members discussed that the policy change shortens the period during which late work can be submitted—from the end of the semester to the end of the quarter or term—to encourage timely submission and provide students with meaningful feedback. Discussion also highlighted differences between the district’s two comprehensive high schools: Central has been transitioning to evidence‑based grading with a 1–4 scale being phased in for lower grades, while Stevens currently uses a traditional 0–100 system and has not moved toward that scale.

Dr. Thompson explained both high schools are at different stages with evidence‑based approaches, and acknowledged that a district‑wide uniform approach would require careful study and could cause disagreement among staff and families. Board members requested a study‑session update on evidence‑based grading to clarify status and implications for teachers, class rank and college conversions.

Following discussion, the board approved the revised late assignments policy by voice vote. The revision was presented as a first/second‑reading item in the meeting’s policy block and received majority support. No specific numerical vote tally was provided on the record; the chair stated the motion carried.