Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Meridian board asks for more research on student-device policy after detailed student and staff input

Meridian School District Board of Directors · June 17, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board discussed Policy & Procedure 3245 (student personal electronic devices) and heard student and staff perspectives about smart watches, enforcement, and classroom phone caddies. Trustees requested more research and examples from other districts before adopting the policy.

Trustees discussed Policy & Procedure 3245 — the district’s draft policy on student use of personal electronic devices — but did not adopt it and asked staff to gather further research and stakeholder input.

The discussion covered several practical issues that trustees said require clearer language and implementation guidance: whether smart watches should be allowed and how to enforce limitations on ‘‘smart capabilities,’’ how to interpret the phrase ‘‘stored out of sight’’ (is a device in a pocket acceptable), enforcement responsibility during hallways, bathrooms or independent-study blocks, and whether classroom phone caddies or locked pouches would be practical districtwide. Students on the board and attending the meeting described how phone caddies or consistent classroom routines reduce distraction and urged a districtwide, consistent approach rather than piecemeal teacher-by-teacher enforcement.

Board members asked staff to bring back policy comparisons from other districts, survey data gathered from the community and staff, and proposed language to clarify enforceability and safety exceptions. One trustee explicitly requested that other stakeholder groups (teachers, administrators, parents) be consulted.

Because a motion to approve the policy led to further discussion and a request for additional analysis, the board did not finalize adoption at this meeting and directed staff to return with revised language and supporting information.