Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Drainage And Crop Damage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners approve ditch bills and deny renter's crop-damage claim after debate
Summary
The board approved routine ditch bills and debated a renter's request for crop-damage compensation after a ditch repair; commissioners expressed concern about precedent and voted to deny the renter's claim, noting the right to appeal.
The Murray County Board approved ditch-related invoices and debated a renter's request for crop-damage compensation resulting from spring ditch repairs.
Staff presented ditch invoices and engineering charges totaling roughly $38,007.78 and recommended payment; the board moved and approved the ditch bills. County staff (Travis) then described a petitioned repair on County Ditch 43 that would replace approximately 2,900 feet of tile. "There was petitioned to replace approximately 2,900 feet," Travis said while explaining tile sizes and probable construction timing.
A renter requested compensation for a small area (about 0.55 acres) he said could not be planted after the spring repair. Staff used local crop-price figures to estimate loss and discussed whether the county has a history of paying crop-damage claims for maintenance repairs. Commissioners repeatedly noted there is little history of paying such claims and expressed concern that approving this renter's payment would set precedent. Citing legal advice and a letter from John Cole that discussed appealability, the board moved to deny the renter's crop-damage claim; the motion was seconded and carried by voice vote. Commissioners noted the decision is appealable and that the county would still be available to explain the process to an appellant.
The ditch repairs themselves will proceed per petition and staff timelines; payments for approved ditch bills were authorized.
