Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parcel Tax topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Oak Grove board says November parcel tax unlikely to pass after district poll
Summary
A consultant poll presented June 18 found initial support for a parcel-tax measure below the two‑thirds threshold required in California; the board concluded the measure is not feasible for November 2026 and will not place it on the ballot now.
The Oak Grove School District Board of Trustees heard results June 18 from EMC Research showing community support for a potential parcel-tax began at about 59%, rose to 64% after proponents’ messages and fell to 56% when voters heard opposition messaging — short of the roughly 67% needed to pass under California law.
Frances (Fran) Guzman of EMC Research said the district surveyed 400 likely November 2026 voters June 4–11 using mixed telephone and online methods in English and Vietnamese, with a reported margin of error of ±4.9 percentage points. Voters rated the district positively and acknowledged funding needs, but “tax sensitivity” and concerns about the economy and the absence of a sunset clause were vulnerabilities that undermined broad support.
Board members asked about methodology, language coverage and the content of opposition messaging. Guzman said opposition narratives that stressed economic strain and the lack of an explicit sunset date were persuasive and that support did not reach a reliable path to the two‑thirds threshold even after providing supportive information.
Based on the data and the consultant’s judgment, several trustees said they would not support placing a parcel tax on the November 2026 ballot. One trustee said running a likely unsuccessful measure would expend district resources and community effort with little chance of success.
The consultant recommended the district pause on a November 2026 revenue measure, use the polling to guide future outreach, and consider rebuilding community trust on fiscal management and clearer messaging before revisiting a measure for a later election cycle.
