Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Signage Ttcda topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Appeal granted to keep monument sign in Hardin Valley after debate over TTCDA design rules
Summary
Knox County commissioners granted an appeal allowing an existing monument sign at 10780 Hardin Valley Road to remain, overturning Planning staff's denial based on Tennessee Technology Corridor design guidelines; the vote was 7–3 after tenants' and Scenic Knoxville's arguments for and against.
Knox County commissioners voted 7–3 to grant an appeal brought by property owner Courtney Stevens and allow a monument sign at 10780 Hardin Valley Road to remain and to accept panels for tenants, reversing the planning staff's recommendation to deny a Tennessee Technology Corridor Development Authority (TTCDA) certificate of appropriateness.
Director Brooke read Planning staff's decision into the record, explaining the staff had found the proposed sign "out of character" with TTCDA design guidelines meant to promote a unified corridor image and reduce visual clutter. The applicant, Courtney Stevens, said the sign predated her purchase of the property in December 2021, that tenants expect sign panels under lease terms and that vegetative buffers make smaller signs effectively invisible.
Kevin Murphy, speaking for Scenic Knoxville, urged the commission to uphold the staff denial. Murphy said approving a retroactive waiver for an unpermitted, larger sign would amount to rewriting the ordinance and undermine consistent application of standards: "A granting individual waiver request, you essentially rewrite the ordinance or the design guidelines," he said.
Commissioners questioned whether the sign truly impeded views or traffic and discussed fairness to property owners who follow permitting rules. The district commissioner moved to grant the appeal; Commissioner Hill moved the formal motion and Commissioner Jay seconded. Voting was opened and the motion passed 7–3.
The commission's decision allows the applicant to proceed with tenant paneling on the sign subject to the county's permitting process. Planning staff and Scenic Knoxville emphasized that the case points to the difficulty of balancing consistent design standards with cases in which nonconforming structures already exist and tenants have contractual expectations.
What happens next: the property owner may pursue the sign paneling permits in line with the commission's decision and county permitting requirements. Planning staff may track whether any additional design adjustments or conditions are later required.
