Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Facilities Cip topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board urges county to speed up generator and ballistic-window projects, citing staff safety concerns

Board of Voter Registration and Elections of Beaufort County · August 20, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board members pressed county staff Aug. 20 for updates on a dedicated generator and ballistic-resistant windows for the elections office, called for a letter to the county administrator, and requested a status update by the next meeting.

Board members used their Aug. 20 meeting to press county staff for a clearer timeline and stronger advocacy on two facilities projects they say are critical for safe, reliable elections: a dedicated backup generator for the elections office and ballistic-resistant windows.

Mr. Ford (speaker 5) and other commissioners stressed frustration that the generator project has been on the county’s capital-improvement project list for years and that a bid-close date of June 30 was referenced in earlier email correspondence; board members said delays make it difficult to test a dedicated unit and to assure staff safety. Director Wendell Robertson (speaker 8) said temporary generators are supplied for every election but that a dedicated, permanently installed generator would permit regular testing and greater reliability.

Several members said ballistic-resistant windows had been identified as a security need by the Department of Homeland Security and asked staff to escalate both projects. Chair (speaker 2) proposed drafting a letter from the board to County Administrator Moore requesting updates and advocacy; he said he would prepare a draft for review at the next meeting. The board also asked staff to provide a project timeline update at the next meeting.

No procurement decisions were made at the meeting; the board instead directed staff to work with county risk-management and CIP staff and to report back.