Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Commercial Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission approves Panda Express site plan with conditions on glazing, facade and pedestrian access
Summary
Commission approved the Panda Express restaurant and dual drive‑thru site plan at roughly 320 E 2600 N with conditions requiring spandrel glass or equivalent to meet code glazing, added architectural features on the street‑facing facade, a shared parking agreement and improved pedestrian connectivity.
The North Ogden City Planning Commission unanimously approved a site plan for a Panda Express restaurant with a dual drive‑thru on the second lot of the Kate's Corner subdivision at about 320 East and 2600 North.
Planner Ryan Nunn summarized staff recommendations: because the rear/kitchen/drive‑thru side would face 2700 North, the building must meet the city’s street‑facing glazing requirement (50% horizontal window coverage) by using functioning exterior doors and either clear windows or spandrel glass as previously allowed by the commission; additional architectural features are encouraged at periodic intervals on the south and east facades; a shared‑parking agreement between the two subdivision lots is required; building and parking lighting and trash enclosure designs must be addressed with building permits; and pedestrian connectivity should extend through parking and connect across to 3rd East.
Applicant Alexis Riggs (Lee/CAF properties) said the developer and tenant teams plan to submit a second site plan covering both lots and will address cross‑access, parking and pedestrian circulation in that submittal. Steven, a civil engineer on the tenant team, said the team has draft cross‑access and parking agreements and does not object to staff conditions. He noted the architectural team is aware of glazing and facade requirements and did not foresee difficulties meeting those conditions.
Several commissioners expressed concern that the south/2700 North elevation reads as a 'back‑of‑house' and asked for explicit emphasis on the 50% glazing and added architectural elements to improve the street presence. Citing a prior example (Ben Lomond Fitness), commissioners said enforcing the glazing condition can materially improve street‑facing aesthetics. Commissioner Green moved to approve the site plan “subject to the conditions of the staff report with special focus on glazing and architectural features specifically on the street‑facing facade.” Commissioner Swanson seconded; the motion passed in a unanimous roll‑call vote.
The approval is conditional: the developer must finalize cross‑access/parking agreements, incorporate the required glazing/architectural details, and resolve signage setbacks via a separate, pending text‑amendment process if necessary. Staff indicated building permits will include lighting and trash‑enclosure details.
