Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Hamlet Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Developers preview Hamlet plan; board raises questions about hotel massing, parking and rooftop bar
Summary
Developer and design team presented an informal update on the Hamlet commercial plan, including a proposed three‑story, ~130‑room hotel with public lobby space, live/work co‑working areas and restaurants; board members supported early ideas but flagged concerns about building mass, ground‑floor activation, parking counts and potential noise/traffic from a rooftop bar.
At the meeting’s other‑business session the board received an informal preview of the Hamlet commercial area from developer representatives Justin Leida and AJ Scott of Steiner and Associates.
Leida said the team has submitted a plat, will soon submit clearing and massing plans and is negotiating contractor agreements; he asked the board for early feedback. AJ Scott showed concept imagery and said a prospective luxury hotel user prefers a public, roomless first floor that activates the street with lobbies, restaurants and a rooftop bar concept. Scott said the scheme emphasizes pedestrian circulation from the north to a strengthened Civic Green and introduces a hotel lobby that is open and accessible to the public.
Board members and staff asked how the hotel and the revised program affect parking counts and how the proposal meets an 80% requirement for ground‑floor retail and public activation in the hamlet. The applicant said parking calculations used the same traffic/parking assumptions as the master plan and estimated about 130 rooms over three floors; the team said corners and some ground‑floor spaces would be occupied by public uses such as an ice cream shop.
Several members raised concerns about building massing and material uniformity (noting a strong brick palette), and about locating a rooftop bar adjacent to existing residences; one commissioner said a rooftop bar ‘‘isn't quiet by any stretch’’ and urged careful study of sound, lighting and traffic impacts. The applicant said event timing, valet and overflow parking will be managed through programming and scheduling, and said height limits remain within the site's 50‑foot maximum (residential nearby is 44 feet).
Because the review was informal the board offered feedback rather than conditions and asked the applicant to refine massing, ground‑floor activation and noise/traffic mitigation plans before a formal submission.
