Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Rezoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council hears proposal to rezone East 9 area; developer outlines $7M infrastructure plan

New Albany City Council · December 17, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff and The New Albany Company presented O-49-2024 to rezone about 30 acres into three subareas with a new gatehouse concept; council and residents raised questions about a small sales/gatehouse dwelling, tree preservation and traffic impacts; staff will return with renderings and detailed plans.

Staff introduced O-49-2024, a rezoning proposal for roughly 30.4 acres in the East 9/country-club area that splits the site into three subareas with differing setbacks and design guidelines. The proposal includes a new Subarea 3 that would allow a small gatehouse or sales office that could later be sold as a single-family dwelling.

Tom Ruby of The New Albany Company described the concept as a way to emphasize high-end architectural standards and said the project includes pavement changes, brick or granite pavers on boulevards, modified parking patterns and landscaping. He estimated more than $7 million in infrastructure work for the neighborhood refresh, including stormwater basin adjustments and wetland plantings.

Councilmembers pressed for renderings and wondered whether a 1,800–2,000-square-foot house in a corner location adjacent to the golf course would be appropriate as a permanent residence. Staff and the developer said those details will return in future submissions to the planning commission and architecture review board. There was discussion about tree-preservation zones, rear-yard utilities (staff said utilities were engineered into front yards to preserve trees), and the need to show how the proposal will fit with golf-cart crossings and existing brick walls.

No final action was taken; council asked staff and the applicant to provide more imagery and details at a subsequent meeting scheduled for Jan. 7.