Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Reproductive Health topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sponsors say 'She Wins Act' aligns abortion care with other medical informed‑consent standards; committee debate turns to content and constitutionality
Summary
Supporters of House Bill 347 told the Senate Health Committee the She Wins Act would require the same informed‑consent standards now applied to other medical procedures, including a 24‑hour reflection period and specified disclosures; senators questioned overlap with existing law, the specificity of required disclosures, and the bill's potential to impose medically questionable statements.
Representatives and supporters testified in favor of House Bill 347, the She Wins Act, telling the Senate Health Committee the bill would ensure abortion and reproductive care are treated like other medical procedures by applying the same informed‑consent standards and providing a minimum 24‑hour reflection period.
Sponsors said the bill does not challenge the 2023 constitutional amendment but instead implements informed‑consent protections so patients receive full, coercion‑free information. The bill would allow informed‑consent meetings to occur by telephone, virtual means, email, or in person and includes a medical‑emergency exception.
During questioning, members raised concerns that Ohio already has informed‑consent statutes for medical procedures and asked whether the bill would require redundant or medically unnecessary disclosures or paperwork (one senator described portions of the bill as potentially requiring "medically questionable statements"). Sponsors said the legislation is designed to be broad about delivery methods for information and invited amendments to tighten language. Exchanges included strongly worded rhetorical questioning and disagreement over whether the bill seeks to re‑impose restrictions voters rejected; sponsors emphasized patient empowerment and transparency.
The committee heard both reassurance from sponsors that emergency exceptions exist and suggestions from members that technical clarifications may be necessary. No formal committee vote was taken on the She Wins Act at the hearing.
