Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Labor Relations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Teachers, parents and union members press Gilroy Unified for higher pay and smaller classes
Summary
Dozens of educators, union representatives and parents told the board that high housing costs and proposed contract terms are forcing experienced teachers out of Gilroy, urging the district to act to retain staff and reduce class sizes.
Get email alerts on the Labor Relations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Dozens of educators, parents and union representatives used the district's public-comment period to urge the Gilroy Unified board to act on teacher compensation, class size and working conditions.
Speakers included classroom teachers, special-education specialists and parents who recounted students left behind by staff turnover and described the economic pressures in Santa Clara County: "The median home price is approximately $1.7 million and average rents exceed $4,000 a month," said speech-language pathologist Stephanie Pedroni, who asked the district to move faster on pay and support for staff covering more complex special-education assignments.
Teachers described large classes and combo-grade assignments that concentrate students requiring intensive support in individual classrooms. Fifth-grade teacher Kimberly Kredowski said 15 of 31 students in her class were promoted while reading multiple grade levels below standard and that combination classes can leave some rooms carrying a higher concentration of students with behavioral and IEP needs.
Several speakers called the board's recent administrator off-schedule payment out of step with teacher compensation; one teacher said she had accepted a position elsewhere because Gilroy could not offer a living wage. "This is educator turnover. It is not an abstract concern. It is happening here and now," one speaker said.
What trustees said: board members listened, acknowledged the comments and referenced the active negotiations with the Gilroy Teachers Association; trustees and staff later discussed where proposed off-schedule payments were budgeted and how those payments would be recorded if a settlement is reached.
Next steps: the board did not take action during public comment; the district said budget and bargaining matters will proceed in future closed- and open-session meetings.

