Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Licensing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Baltimore liquor board approves hardship extension and multiple outdoor‑service and transfer requests
Summary
The Board of Liquor License Commissioners approved a 180‑day hardship extension for La Cuchara after a January kitchen fire and granted transfers or outdoor‑service permissions to Copper Union and Barracuda's Tavern after hearing applicants’ testimony and neighborhood outreach.
Get email alerts on the Licensing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Board of Liquor License Commissioners for Baltimore City on June 18 approved several licensing requests, including a hardship extension for a restaurant damaged by fire and applications to transfer or add outdoor table service.
Steven W. Fogman, attorney for Field LLC, told the board that a January 4 fire at La Cuchara caused extensive kitchen damage and that the owner had already spent about $85,000 to replace the hood. Fogman asked the board to grant a 180‑day hardship extension starting after the statutory 180‑day deadline, which would carry the license through Dec. 30, 2026. The board voted to approve the extension.
In a separate matter, counsel Drew Tilden presented a transfer and outdoor‑service request for a Class BD7 license to move from 5736 Falls Road to 5700 Cottonworth Avenue for the Copper Union social club. Tilden said the applicant had consulted the Sabina Matfeld Neighborhood Association, which reported no opposition. Manager‑applicant Mr. Rossi described membership structures, classes and proposed hours for food and beverage service. Commissioners approved the ownership/location transfer and outdoor table service.
William Hughes, representing Barracuda LLC (Barracuda’s Tavern), told commissioners his application to add temporary outdoor table service had neighborhood support and the required zoning clearances; the board voted to approve the request, subject to the usual temporary‑permit conditions from the Department of Housing and Community Development.
Board members said they relied on submitted exhibits, testimony and the record when making their rulings. No conditions beyond standard permit requirements were stated at the time of approval.
The board recessed to consider enforcement matters later in the docket.

