Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Civic Engagement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board holds first reading on student advisory council policy, seeks legal clarity on statutory requirement
Summary
In a lengthy first reading, Sumner County Board members debated whether state law requires a single rotating student representative at public meetings or a countywide council; the board asked legal staff to revise the policy and return with clarifying language.
The Sumner County School Board on June 16 held a prolonged first reading of proposed policy 1.1021 to create a student advisory council and asked the board attorney and staff to clarify how the new state statute’s minimum requirement should be implemented.
Board members said the statute requires each district to adopt a policy authorizing “a high‑school student to serve as an advisory non‑voting representative on the board during meetings that are open to the public,” but the district’s draft policy proposed a council with representatives from each high school. Mr. King, citing the statute language, called for ensuring the policy meets the minimum requirement that at least one student be present during public sessions.
Several members urged simplicity and student leadership. Miss Hayes and others recalled a prior advisory council model that delivered semester presentations and suggested reestablishing staff support and student liaisons. Mr. Lacy requested that the selection panels be clearly tied to each school and that principals and teachers be included in selection discussions.
Staff said the draft can be revised and that the board’s attorney will review statutory requirements; staff proposed the council could prepare reports after study sessions for the voting meeting and that the group’s first action could be to define its own operating rules. Board members also discussed logistical support and whether to assign a staff liaison or a board member to work with students.
The board took no final vote and left the item at first reading. Staff were asked to collect edits from members, seek attorney guidance on the statute, consult legislators if needed, and bring a revised draft back for action at a subsequent meeting.
