Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Utilities topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council reviews first reading to update city code on utility billing after state law changes

Winchester City Council · July 9, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff presented a first reading to amend utility-billing sections to comply with new state requirements (longer notice periods, bilingual notices, heat-related disconnect limits) and proposed optional changes including switching residential customers to monthly billing and raising the reconnection fee.

On July 9 the Winchester City Council received a first reading of O2024-12, an ordinance to amend City Code sections governing utility billing to comply with recent changes to state law. Public Services Director Perry Eisenach explained mandatory changes: utilities may not disconnect water for nonpayment until at least 60 days after a bill is first due (effectively pushing disconnection to day 90 under the city’s proposed schedule), notices must be sent in English and Spanish, disconnections may not occur on Fridays, weekends, state holidays or days before state holidays, and disconnections are prohibited when the temperature is 92 °F or higher.

Eisenach described optional measures council could adopt at this time: converting residential accounts from a bimonthly to monthly billing cycle (with a proposed January 1 start), reducing the minimum monthly charge to keep annual bills neutral for customers, and increasing the reconnection fee from $40 to $50 to better reflect administrative costs. Staff estimated the administrative cost of monthly billing at about $36,000 annually (postage and printing) and said the change is not expected to increase overall annual payments by customers because the minimum charge would be adjusted.

Councilors questioned budget impacts, whether the change would improve leak detection or water conservation, landlord/tenant implications for accounts billed to owners, and public outreach before implementation. Some councilors supported the consumer-protection aspects of the mandatory changes but were split on approving the optional monthly-billing conversion immediately because of its budget impact. Staff offered to gather public feedback before the ordinance returns for additional readings.

Next steps: O2024-12 was presented for first reading; no final vote was taken. Staff will gather public input and return the ordinance for further consideration.