Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Finance Contracts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Union City council approves engineering fund increase, park electrical work and farm maintenance
Summary
The Union City Village Council voted June 2 to increase available on-call engineering funds for the village’s EPA response, authorized roughly $3,000 of electrical work for Eastside Park and well-field safety, and approved limited farm planting and maintenance on 19 acres under the north water tower.
Get email alerts on the Municipal Finance Contracts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Union City’s Village Council voted June 2 to give staff flexibility to respond to an EPA notice by increasing the village’s on-call engineering funds, authorized electrical work at Eastside Park and the municipal well field, and approved a limited planting and maintenance plan for village-owned farmland.
The engineering item arose after RQA&D was sold and rebranded as DCCM. Village staff told the council the original on-call agreement was for $15,000 and had about $500–$600 remaining; staff said the firm proposed adding another $15,000 so the firm could respond to an EPA notice. The motion recorded in the meeting transcript was, “I’ll make a motion to increase that. To $10,000 for BCCM.” The council voted to approve the motion as stated in the record.
Why it matters: increasing on-call funds gives the village immediate engineering capacity to prepare a response to the EPA notice and to commission short-term work while staff pursue longer-term procurement or budget adjustments.
Councilmembers then considered electrical work requested from BGB Electric. Steve, a village staff member who presented the estimates, said crews wanted to remove lower service drops at the well houses that pose a hazard to workers mowing and to install a small service at Eastside Park to power new security cameras. Steve told the council the well-field work was estimated at about $2,500 and the park service would be “somewhere between four and five hundred” dollars; he summarized the package as “about three grand.” The council approved the contract work, with the village water department covering most of the cost of the service-drop work.
On village-owned farmland, council members reviewed a recommendation from tenant Kenneth Gower to plant and treat the field now—even though irrigation repairs are pending—because leaving the ground untreated would take years to recover. Staff said the village will receive cash rent only on the 19 acres under the north water tower and that treating the field now would reduce future mowing. The council voted to approve Gower’s request to proceed with fertilization, weed control and planting.
What was decided (actions at a glance): the council approved the motion on increased engineering funds (motion text recorded in the transcript), authorized BGB Electric work to address service drops and provide a camera service at Eastside Park (approx. $3,000), and approved a plan allowing the farm tenant to fertilize, treat weeds and plant on the 19-acre parcel. The council also voted to enter an executive session at 6:37 p.m. to review water/sewage findings.
The council’s minutes say staff will return with any necessary contract documents and further budget details; the transcript shows some inconsistency in the precise dollar figures discussed for the engineering line item, which staff will need to clarify in the formal contract documentation.

