Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Mre Management 130 N Bedford topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mount Kisco Planning Board asks staff to draft resolution after MRE Management presents parking, landscaping and dumpster revisions
Summary
MRE Management presented a site-plan (PB2025-0470) for 130 North Bedford Road asking for additional parking and site changes; the Planning Board requested plan clarifications and directed staff to draft a resolution for the next meeting after applicant revisions are submitted.
MRE Management’s site-plan application for 130 North Bedford Road (PB2025-0470) was the subject of detailed review and staff queries at the June 10 Mount Kisco Planning Board meeting. The board did not take final action; instead, it directed staff to draft a resolution for consideration at a future meeting once the applicant submits requested revisions.
Representatives from the applicant team — Charles V. Martabano, Esq.; Richard Williams of Insite Engineering; and Donald and John Martabano of MRE Management — described current and proposed uses for the site and requested additional parking. Williams outlined proposed site changes including upgraded landscaping, an upgraded dumpster enclosure, relocating a handicap parking space and hashed area, and possible removal of a chain-link fence.
Building Inspector Peter J. Miley reviewed the proposed parking layout with the board and required additional plan updates. The board discussed the refuse area and confirmed a steep slope on the property would not be altered. Mr. Miley asked the applicant to revise landscaping labels and to add a concrete walkway label on the plans.
Village Engineer Anthony Oliveri asked whether the impervious coverage would be reduced or remain the same. Williams said a small increase was contemplated but that the coverage calculations were correct and the site would remain under the 80% coverage threshold; he also said there would be a reduction tied to the alteration of the dumpster enclosure.
After the technical exchanges, the board directed staff to draft a resolution for review at the next meeting after the applicant submits the requested plan changes. Co-Chair Michael McGuirk moved to close the meeting; Barbara Roppolo seconded. The motion to close carried 4–0 and the meeting adjourned at 7:20 p.m.
The Planning Board’s directive to staff leaves final action pending receipt and review of revised plans and the draft resolution.
