Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Town of Wayne committee finalizes RFP specs for culverts, ditching and tree work and asks Pike to asphalt driveways
Summary
The Road Committee agreed draft RFP language for culvert replacement, ditching, erosion control and separate tree/brush work; it recommended that Pike, the wearing‑surface contractor, asphalt driveways to reduce joints and asked staff to clarify state‑right‑of‑way culvert responsibility and to seek a schedule shift from Pike.
The Town of Wayne Road Committee on Thursday worked through detailed RFP language and specifications for a summer contract package that will cover culvert replacements, ditching, erosion control and related driveway work, with tree and brush removal carved into a separate but coordinated contract.
A committee member said the group would ask Pike, the contractor scheduled to place wearing surfaces, “to asphalt the driveways. Period.” The committee agreed that if Pike handles driveway paving it will reduce the number of joints homeowners see in their driveways.
Committee members reviewed culvert sizing and inventory and debated who should supply culvert materials. After weighing handling, storage and timing risks, the committee favored letting the awarded contractor provide culverts rather than the town stockpiling pipe, partly to avoid supply‑chain and delivery problems.
The RFP language discussed includes a minimum bury depth for driveway culverts (12 inches unless the road commissioner approves an exception), 4–6‑inch compacted backfill lifts around culverts, and erosion‑control requirements tied to slope thresholds (seed/mulch on gentler slopes, erosion fabric or rock on steeper sections). Members also agreed to reference current DOT material specifications for crossroad culverts and to leave driveway culvert installation method flexible where DOT standards do not apply.
Tree limbing and brush removal were recommended to be bid as a separate contract so smaller specialty contractors can bid directly; the committee stressed tight coordination so tree work precedes ditching and culvert installation to avoid rework. The committee also discussed homeowner notification and debris handling: the draft specification will ask staff to notify owners and allow a short pickup window for firewood before contractors remove remaining debris.
The group flagged one culvert (index item 10) that appears to lie in state right‑of‑way and asked staff to confirm state ownership before awarding that specific line item; the item will be listed in the RFP so bids can include it but awards can exclude it if the state retains responsibility.
Members raised timing concerns: the draft schedule contains conflicting dates (the packet references both June 26 and July 26 for bid-related deadlines). The committee agreed to clarify the calendar with the select board and proposed a special meeting so an award can be made early enough to allow contractors time to obtain bonds and schedule work ahead of Pike’s planned wearing‑surface window (Pike’s start date was discussed as July 27). The committee asked staff to request at least a two‑week start delay from Pike if needed to ensure the culvert/ditch work can be completed before paving.
Henry and one other committee member volunteered to finalize (“word‑smith”) the RFP language and return final documents for committee review before posting. Staff was asked to verify culvert ownership in the state right‑of‑way and to confirm specific bid dates before public advertisement.
The committee did not take a formal vote on a single motion at the meeting; the decisions above reflect consensus directions for final RFP drafting and next procedural steps.
