Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Employee Healthcare topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Woodbury County told it could face up to $1.5 million shortfall in employee health fund; board to weigh midterm plan changes
Summary
County staff presented projections showing the employee health fund could be underfunded by $250,000 to $1.5 million if plan design and contribution levels are not adjusted. Consultants proposed a midpoint plan and more tiered pricing; unions and department heads urged inclusion and clearer communication before open enrollment closes Dec. 10.
Get email alerts on the Employee Healthcare topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Woodbury County supervisors received an informational briefing showing the county's employee health fund faces a potential shortfall that staff estimated could range from about $250,000 on an optimistic monthly-average scenario to as much as $1.0–$1.5 million in a worst-case projection.
The presentation by Ryan, a county staff member responsible for health fund reporting, laid out fiscal-year figures: county contributions of roughly $6.5 million, employee premiums near $578,000 and total claims paid of about $8.7 million. "The total claims paid out was 8.7," Ryan said, and under a simple month-average projection the fund could be about $250,000 short; using last year's actuals he said the shortfall could be roughly $1 million, and Wellmark's worst-case estimate pushed the gap near $1.5 million.
That shortfall, board members said, explains the compressed schedule: open enrollment runs through Dec. 10, and last-week delays from the carrier limited the window to present alternatives to employees. "If we're going to do something about the health plans, this is above my pay grade," one supervisor said in introducing the briefing.
Seth, a Gallagher consultant working with the county, proposed a tiered, "middle ground" option intended to split the difference between the plan shown last week and the county's current grandfathered design. He cautioned that a Health Savings Account (HSA) approach would require raising deductibles substantially ("the minimum deductible that you can have for a high deductible health plan... $1,700") and that fully insured alternatives could cost 7–8% more and reduce local control. Seth said he expected a midpoint spreadsheet and four-tier pricing (single, employee+spouse, employee+child(ren), family) to be ready within days for board review.
Public commenters and department heads urged the board to move cautiously and include unions and staff in the discussion. Tony Wingert of the sheriff's office said employees repeatedly ask for raises and described the process as feeling rushed. "We got to give us time to make you whole," he said, echoing a plea for "small bites." Corey Davis, president of CBA Local 7103, asked that department heads and union officials be formally invited to the conversations so the unions can help communicate accurate information to members.
Several staff and line employees described the direct household impact of higher deductibles and premiums. Kyle Sanderson, a District 5 Secondary Roads employee, said, "I personally guarantee you I will hit the $6,000 mark," citing diabetes and other conditions; he added that a $6,000 out-of-pocket figure could amount to roughly $400 a month in added cost and would likely force some workers to seek additional employment.
Board members and staff agreed on procedural next steps: the board received the informational presentation by motion and asked Gallagher and county finance staff to provide detailed modeling of the midpoint proposal and four-tier rates before any formal decision. A motion to "receive" the briefing passed unanimously. No changes to benefits or premiums were adopted at the meeting.
The board said it may call a special meeting once the consultant's midweek numbers are available; staff committed to providing Iowa-specific benchmarking, dependent-premium scenarios and the four-tier pricing as soon as the vendors return the census-based quotes. The county emphasized the goal of preserving a self-funded plan where possible while searching for options that reduce the risk to county reserves and limit the immediate burden on employees.

