Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Litigation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Leo City Council adjourns to closed session to discuss two lawsuits

Leo City Council · June 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a 5:30 p.m. special meeting the Leo City Council adjourned into closed session to confer with legal counsel on two existing lawsuits—Leitzke v. City of Vallejo and Kroll v. City of Vallejo—under California Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1); no public commenters signed up to speak.

The Leo City Council convened a special meeting at 5:30 p.m. and immediately adjourned into closed session to consult with legal counsel on two pending lawsuits. "Council will meet this evening in closed session on 2 items," the city attorney said, listing the two cases.

The city attorney identified the matters as Leitzke v. City of Vallejo, Solano County Superior Court case number CU23-02170, and Kroll v. City of Vallejo, Solano County Superior Court case number CU25-10022, noting the discussions were pursuant to California Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1). The mayor opened a brief public-comment period on the closed-session items; staff reported no in-person or online speakers had signed up, and the mayor closed public comment before adjourning into closed session.

No motions or votes on the merits of the litigation were recorded in the public portion of the meeting. The council moved into closed session to receive legal advice and discuss the cases; any formal decisions or actions resulting from that closed session were not announced in the public record at the time the meeting was adjourned.