Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the SoJo Marketplace Pid topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
South Jordan tables SoJo Marketplace PID amid state-auditor uncertainty
Summary
After a public hearing on a proposed 17-acre SoJo Marketplace public infrastructure district, the council voted to table the resolution until its July 21 meeting, citing uncertainty over how the state auditor treats PIDs and possible fiscal impacts on city audits and distributions.
The South Jordan City Council unanimously voted to table action on Resolution R-2026-13, which would create the SoJo Marketplace Public Infrastructure District (PID), after an extended public hearing and legal and fiscal discussion.
Assistant City Manager Dom Tingey and applicant representatives described the proposal as a roughly 17-acre commercial project along South Jordan Parkway that developers have worked on for about two years. Applicant John Guest said the team has site and construction plans for a first phase and tenant interest but that PID approval is needed to finalize financing and some lease terms.
Developer-aligned speaker David Cannon of Larry H. Miller Real Estate told the council he supported the PID and urged close coordination on public infrastructure and transportation connections to the adjacent university site. "Public infrastructure that connects these will help make this work well," Cannon said.
Council discussion centered on recent guidance from the Utah State Auditor's Office that has led auditors to treat some PIDs as component units on municipal audits. City legal counsel and outside counsel Matt Entz argued that component-unit accounting is an auditing and reporting treatment and, in their view, does not itself create legal liability for the city. Entz told the council that PIDs are independent governmental entities and that bondholders'recourse is to PID revenues and property-tax streams, not the city's general assets.
But City CFO Sunil Maidu and others warned the council that under the state auditor's current interpretation, a PID could be reported on the city's financial statements as a component unit; auditors have the authority to withhold state-distributed revenues if they require component-unit reporting as a condition of compliance. Maidu said that while a $5 million PID issuance may not by itself be large, "it will be considered as part of the city" in financial reporting and could be examined by rating agencies. Mayor Dawn Ramsey and several council members said the possibility of withheld state distributions or audit complications posed an unacceptable near-term risk.
Given the uncertainty, the council moved to table consideration of R-2026-13 until its July 21 meeting. The motion was seconded and the council adopted the tabling by roll-call vote. Council members who spoke in favor of tabling repeatedly urged staff and council members to contact the state auditor and legislative representatives to seek clarity.
Applicant representatives said tabling will affect the project timetable and tenant negotiations but acknowledged the council's fiduciary concern. Staff noted the applicant's documents and governing language will still need lieutenant governor approval and that the application window for certain approvals expires in October, creating a limited timeline.
The SoJo Marketplace team and city staff were directed to pursue clarifying guidance from the state auditor and legislative contacts and to return the item to the council on July 21 for reconsideration.
