Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Paoli council schedules executive session amid dispute over police fundraiser post; public comments back employee
Summary
The council set an executive session for Jan. 27 to consider an employee complaint and retroactively approved memos regarding Brian Campbell and a department-policy notice; several residents spoke in support of Brian Campbell and one resident said a new policy singled out an individual.
Get email alerts on the Personnel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Paoli Town Council on Jan. 21 voted to hold an executive session on Monday, Jan. 27 at 5:00 p.m. to consider a formal employee complaint after discussion about memos circulated by Council President Bobbie Bostock.
Town Attorney Hunt Reynolds presented a Jan. 16 memo that had been sent to Code Enforcement Administrator Benji Farris directing daily submission of enforcement logs to the town office; the council retroactively approved that memo in a 4-1 vote with Donna Dillard abstaining. Reynolds also presented a separate Jan. 16 memo to all department heads concerning Brian Campbell and an entity identified as "LRC," which the council retroactively approved in a 4-1 vote with Donna Dillard voting no.
Council discussion noted a post on the Paoli Police Website stating a fundraiser for an officer — referenced in the minutes as "Officer Zack Andry" — was no longer allowed under a new town policy. The minutes also state that Officer Zack Cook told the council he posted the notice and that it was his decision. The transcript contains both names ("Zack Andry" and "Zack Cook") in different places; the council minutes do not reconcile the discrepancy. Amy Gilbert, during public comment, said the new policy appeared to single out one individual. Multiple residents — Leela Campbell, Sarah Patton, Michael Dillard and Preston Judd — spoke in support of Brian Campbell.
The council set the executive session to address the personnel matter; no formal disciplinary action or reversal of the website post was recorded in the public minutes.
