Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Instructional Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District instructional leaders outline multi-tiered support, LETRS training and data plan to boost achievement
Summary
District instructional leaders presented a month‑by‑month continuous improvement model, described LETRS two‑year reading training (about 750 educators in the LETRS pathway), OGAP math supports, and coaching/benchmark schedules intended to strengthen literacy and math instruction across Beaufort County schools.
District instructional leaders presented a structured plan on Sept. 26 to support classroom instruction, align curriculum to South Carolina standards and monitor progress through recurring benchmarks and coaching cycles.
The presentation framed student achievement as the district’s central goal and walked board members through a continuous improvement model, multi-tiered systems of support (MTSS) for academics and behavior, and a calendar of supports from January through December tied to benchmark windows and coaching cycles.
Director for literacy Melissa Murray explained the district’s LETRS rollout: the training is a two‑year commitment for schools, 11 elementary schools have completed two years, roughly 750 educators are in LETRS pathways districtwide, and middle‑school and some 4th/5th grade teachers have the option to opt in. On math, presenters described OGAP supports focused on fluency, number sense and fractions and said the district aligned materials to the South Carolina College- and Career-Ready standards.
Board members asked about the ‘cadence of change’ — how quickly teachers can adopt new practices — and how executive directors and coaches are integrated into the work. Presenters described a schedule of monthly coach meetings, side‑by‑side classroom visits, data conferences and three state‑required benchmark windows used to measure interim progress.
Nut graf: The presentation emphasized implementation rather than a single new initiative: leaders described layered instructional supports (materials, coaching, interventionists, and monitoring) that they say will help teachers adjust practice and students make measurable gains.
What the board asked for: Several board members requested an academic-committee follow‑up that would present the specific data sources beyond state test scores (attendance, behavior, walk‑through findings) that specialists will use to monitor progress and guide adjustments.
Ending: District leaders said they will continue to provide monthly and quarterly updates and to return to the board with monitoring evidence and suggested next steps for targeted schools.
