Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Memorial Marker Blackwood topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission endorses Blackwood Farm memorial concept; St. Matthew’s to pursue its own marker

Orange County HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION · March 25, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Orange County staff presented a proposed stone memorial and draft inscription to commemorate enslaved residents at Blackwood Farm Park; the commission agreed the concept and text were appropriate. A separate St. Matthew’s Church memorial effort will proceed independently due to lack of county funding.

On March 25 the Orange County Historic Preservation Commission reviewed a proposed stone memorial marker and draft inscription intended to recognize the enslaved community associated with Blackwood Farm Park.

Peter Sandbeck, cultural resources coordinator, shared images of the proposed marker and said the draft language was adapted from the inscription used at the African Burial Ground in New York City; the design concept includes a Sankofa bird image. After members reviewed the imagery and draft text, commissioners agreed the proposed concept and inscription text were appropriate for the site and consistent with memorial goals.

Staff also reported on a longer-term memorial project at St. Matthew’s Church intended to honor enslaved members associated with the church’s early history. That project has engaged descendants groups, including feedback from the Stagville descendants, who recommended placing a marker on St. Mary’s Road. Because the county has not yet established a county marker program and has no dedicated funding in place, the St. Matthew’s committee planned to proceed on its own.

Commission discussion focused on the appropriateness of wording and design and on coordinating with descendant communities and partner groups in each project. No specific county funding or formal landmark action was recorded at the meeting for either memorial; staff flagged the need to coordinate with the Human Relations Commission and with local descendant stakeholders as follow-up work.