Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Community Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Community Development seeks full‑time forestry officer and outlines multi‑year sidewalk projects

Town Board (work session) · October 22, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Community Development requested funding to convert an unfilled part‑time forestry officer post to a full‑time position and reviewed two federally funded sidewalk projects with multi‑year timelines; staff noted a $200,000 consulting line intended as flexible grant/consultant funds subject to board approval.

Garrett Duquesne, commissioner of Community Development and Conservation, asked the board Oct. 22 to consider converting a vacant part‑time forestry officer position into a full‑time role (roughly $80,000) after months of unsuccessful recruitment.

Duquesne said the depart­ment has five full‑time staff and had relied on a part‑time certified arborist to process tree permits; without that role the deputy commissioner and others are covering permit work. He said a full‑time hire would speed permit processing and could free staff time to assist parks and public works on urgent tree matters.

Duquesne also reviewed capital requests for two TAP/grant sidewalk projects—Old Army Sidewalk and Knollwood Road—each with a large federal reimbursement component. He said environmental review and federal/state processing make these multi‑year projects and estimated earliest construction in 2027–2028.

On consulting, Duquesne said the capital budget includes a $200,000 consulting line intended as flexible funding to respond to mid‑cycle grant opportunities and unanticipated needs; he emphasized that any expenditure from that line would require a separate town‑board resolution.

Board members asked for clarity on the consulting line and whether it represented a year‑to‑date spending total or a budgeted appropriation; staff said the line is intended as a placeholder and that actual draws would come back to the board for approval.

Duquesne said he would coordinate with Parks & Recreation and public works to determine whether a shared forestry role or other cross‑departmental solution is feasible and would provide a recommendation to the board.