Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Teacher Evaluation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Centerville-Abington board reviews new 2026–27 teacher evaluation system, tables vote for further review
Summary
Board members reviewed a redesigned teacher evaluation system that removes a state-style "Part B," moves records to Google Docs (saving an estimated $6,000) and requires at least one long and one short observation; members agreed to delay a final vote to allow more review time.
The Centerville-Abington Community Schools board reviewed a rewritten teacher evaluation package for the 2026–27 school year but tabled a final vote to allow additional review.
A presenter who led the development work told the board the district used recent state law changes to simplify the system and remove what the presenter called a burdensome Part B that previously skewed scores. "I think this is going to be the fairest evaluation we've had since we've been here," the presenter said, adding that administrators will conduct at least one long and one short observation to form a total score and that staff may upload artifacts as part of the record.
The presenter said the district collaborated with stakeholders while drafting the tools: "we sat down with a representative of each group. So we sat down with some of the special ed teachers ... we sat down with the association ... Mrs. Steelman and Mrs. Babins," and that the group reviewed the documents "word for word." The presenter also said the district will move evaluation documents to Google Docs, estimating the change will save about $6,000 compared with the prior storage system.
Board members pressed on implementation details, including whether teachers or board members would see evaluations before they are finalized and how review periods would work. The presenter said administrators give the first written evaluation to teachers "within seven days of doing that as part of it" and that training will be provided to administrators before rollout; the presenter also noted the evaluation package is approved annually and can be revised after the first year of use.
After discussion, a board member proposed delaying the vote to give the board and staff more time to review the materials. The chair agreed and the vote on the 2026–27 evaluation tools was tabled until the next meeting so members can review the packet and request clarifications or a demonstration.
The presenter said demonstrations of the new Google Docs process are available and that the district will proceed with administrator training if the board approves the package at a later meeting.
