Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Accountability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board hears overview of state K–12 accountability overhaul; attendance and SSIs could reshape school grades
Summary
District staff briefed trustees on a new state accountability system that prioritizes attendance and student‑success indicators (SSIs), notes growth measures and subject areas beyond reading/math, and sets an initial A grade at 85–100 while calculations are performed by an external vendor.
District staff told the Centerville‑Abington Com Schs board that a new state K–12 accountability system — already being applied to the current school year — will change how school grades are calculated and that the state has entrusted some calculations to an external contractor.
“Attendance is going to be a priority,” a staff presenter said, explaining why the district revised handbooks and attendance policies to reflect new thresholds (for example, a 94% attendance threshold was discussed). Staff said student‑success indicators (SSIs) are effectively bonus points that can move a student’s contribution to a school grade; the presenter said “one SSI could increase a student's grade by 10 percentage points,” and that students can earn up to three SSIs for measures such as meeting growth targets, completing graduation planning, work‑based learning hours or earning college/AP/CTE credits.
Staff noted a change in the initial grading scale: an A will begin at 85–100 for the rollout year, with planned increases tied to statewide A rates in subsequent years. The presenter said the Department of Education will treat the coming year as “year zero” but that public dashboards will show the results and “people are going to see it” even if the state initially treats it as non‑consequential.
Trustees raised concerns about transparency and data management. One staff member said, “a lot of the questions that we have, we do not have answers to simply because the DOE can't tell us how it works” and that the state is sending data to a separate vendor to do calculations. Staff also said data will need frequent uploads from the district’s student information system and that the district expects an initial grade in October or November for the year‑zero calculation.
Trustees discussed practical implications: expanded emphasis on social studies and science test results, new credit and sequencing expectations in middle/high school (e.g., credit thresholds and dual/CTE credit SSIs), and administrative steps the district has already taken (career plans for seventh graders, additional PSAT/SAT emphasis, attendance policy changes).
Next steps: staff will continue gathering state guidance, provide requested calculation details when available, and monitor data uploads so the district is prepared for the October/November grade release.
