Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Misc topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Supervisors set dates for battery-storage, data-center, pipeline and solar ordinance hearings

Humboldt County Board of Supervisors · June 22, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Following the wind-ordinance hearing, the board opened a public hearing on a battery energy storage ordinance (Ord. 78) and set third-reading dates for multiple land-use ordinances (battery storage, data center, pipeline, solar) to allow planning staff to draft rules; the board also discussed a proposed interdepartmental loan for a bike-trail project.

After lengthy discussion about the wind ordinance, the Humboldt County Board of Supervisors opened a public hearing on Ordinance 78, a proposed battery energy storage ordinance, and approved a 12-month moratorium to give planning staff time to draft appropriate standards.

County staff explained the moratorium's purpose: the county currently has no specific ordinance governing large battery-energy-storage systems and wants time to study the technical and safety requirements before permitting. There was little public opposition recorded during the brief battery-storage hearing; the board set a third-reading date for July 13, 2026, at 9:00 a.m.

The board also opened public hearings or set public-review dates for several other land-use ordinances: a data center ordinance (Ord. 80), a pipeline transmission ordinance (Ord. 81) and a solar utility systems ordinance (Ord. 82). At least one public commenter warned that large data centers can consume substantial water and can create infrastructure burdens; supervisors agreed to research those impacts and scheduled follow-up hearings (for example, Ord. 80 was discussed for a July 15 public hearing).

Routine business continued after those hearings: supervisors clarified the accounting mechanics of a proposed interdepartmental advance to fund a local bike-trail project (about $150,000 fronted by the county with an expected roughly $45,000 in private fundraising to reimburse the county over time) and received committee reports on dispatch, drainage tile and road concerns. The meeting adjourned at about 10:56 a.m.

The board set multiple continued hearings to allow additional study and public comment; staff were directed to coordinate notices and report back.