Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Procurement Contracts topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Kirklin council awards mulch and well-cleaning contracts after competitive bids

Kirklin Town Council · May 26, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Kirklin Town Council awarded a 40-yard playground mulch contract to Metzinger Construction and selected Ortman for well cleaning after reviewing competing bids; bid amounts and key specifications were discussed.

The Kirklin Town Council approved two procurement decisions: a 40-yard playground mulch purchase and a well-cleaning contract covering two municipal wells.

For playground mulch, staff presented three competitive bids for 40 yards: Metzinger Construction at $1,839.46, Barrett Farms at $1,840.40, and Green Cycle at $1,842.00. A council member moved to award the mulch job to Metzinger Construction; the motion was seconded and carried by voice/hand vote. Council members noted Barrett Farms’ local support and that Green Cycle had previously donated mulch for the town’s bump-outs (Shelby of Antique Seller facilitated that donation).

For well cleaning, staff reported identical specifications given to bidders: pre- and post-cleaning video inspections, a three-day cleaning, pump pull and reinstall, two bacteriological samples, replacement of a 7.5-horsepower 460V three-phase motor, 100 ft of submersible wire, a bronze inline check valve and two 4-inch stainless steel nipples. Submitted bids for well number one and well number two varied: National Water Services quoted approximately $32,061–$32,600 per well; Hartman Well Drilling bid $21,420 per well; Careless resubmitted about $32,570. Council members discussed vendor experience and records; one member noted Ortman had reliable records and was approximately $10,500–$11,000 cheaper than others on prior work.

A motion to award the well-cleaning contract to Ortman was moved and seconded and carried by voice/hand vote; the transcript does not provide a roll-call tally. Staff was directed to proceed with contract arrangements and scheduling.

Both procurement votes were carried that night without recorded tallies; details on contract execution (start dates, payment schedules, insurance or bond requirements) were not specified in the record.