Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Enrollment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Consultants tell Littleton board housing growth could add about 1,000 students over 10 years, but service rate may fall to 50%
Summary
Applied Economics presented neighborhood-level enrollment and housing projections showing 8,400 new housing units over 10 years and projected K–8 pupil growth concentrated in specific attendance areas; presenters warned charter schools, ESAs and falling service rates complicate recapture efforts and urged targeted marketing and planning.
Get email alerts on the Enrollment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Applied Economics presented a district-level demographic and enrollment study to the Littleton Elementary District governing board and staff, projecting broad housing growth but mixed implications for K–8 enrollment.
The consultant team told the board the district could see roughly 8,400 new housing units come online in the next decade and an associated increase of nearly 1,000 students by 2035 concentrated in areas along the Broadway corridor and the Australia Vista attendance area. The firm’s residential specialist, Don Graves, described multiple active subdivisions and phases (Alamar phase five, Shadow Ridge, Three Rivers Ranch) that will add single-family lots and multi-family units in coming years.
“We’re looking at about the next five years where a lot of construction is going to be building and then you’re going to start building these out,” the presenter said, outlining phases expected to add several hundred lots per builder. The study’s housing outlook is paired with a top-down enrollment model and a neighborhood-level mapping of current student homes.
At the same time, the consultants said falling birth rates, growing charter enrollment and ESA participation have reduced the district’s service rate (the share of school-age children living in the district who attend district schools). The report estimated the service rate has declined roughly 16 percentage points since 2015 and—under conservative assumptions—could fall to about 50% by 2035 even as the school-age population rises.
“That last calculation is the most tenuous,” the presenter said, noting that projected school-age population growth does not automatically translate into district enrollment because of choice programs and open enrollment patterns.
Board members pressed for local detail. One asked whether growth shown in the Cashin neighborhood reflected new construction or turnover of existing housing; the consultant said some older pockets still have vacant lots and incremental infill may occur but most near-term growth will come from the named master-planned phases. Several trustees focused on marketing and retention, arguing that events like the recent district community festival and strategic communications could capture students who now choose charter options.
The study included maps showing attendance-area gains and declines, cohort-size analyses by grade group, and scenarios accounting for slower declines in district capture. The consultants offered to provide follow-up material and recommended that the district consider targeted attendance-area planning, boundary exercises and marketing outreach for recapture.
The board did not take any formal action on the study itself; members requested additional material and asked administration to return with implications for staffing, boundaries and any items that should inform the upcoming budget and bond exploratory work.

