Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Field Trips topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board presses district for clarity after eighth‑grade trip fails to meet threshold; seeks better outreach and affordability
Summary
Following a failed eighth‑grade signature trip, Littleton board members urged making signature trips more accessible, asked for a district communications timeline and requested detailed participation and cost data for each school; the district said the eighth‑grade trip was passed to the school after 'only three parents signed up' and that the sixth‑grade Camp‑Way trip remains active with 51 students enrolled.
Board members spent significant time debating the future, equity and administration of signature field trips for sixth through eighth graders after the district canceled an eighth‑grade trip this year for failing to meet a minimum‑participation threshold.
Member Soynic said she supports preserving signature trips as meaningful student experiences but pushed the district to make them affordable and accessible to the majority of families. "I want to keep the signature field trips but I want them to be more accessible to all of our students," she said.
Board members raised several recurring concerns: the high out‑of‑pocket cost for families that can exceed hundreds or over a thousand dollars across multiple grade levels; whether signature trips should be tailored to school programs (for example, arts‑focused trips for fine‑arts schools); and whether district or school staff should coordinate large trips such as Washington, D.C. Several members proposed multi‑year payment or fundraising solutions to help families afford participation.
District staff explained existing risk‑management and approval processes for field trips and said regular day trips remain available at every grade level. Superintendent Dr. Lefit told the board the eighth‑grade district trip was passed back to the school because it did not meet the minimum participant threshold, noting, "there were only three parents signed up"; he also said Camp‑Way (the sixth‑grade signature trip) remained active with 51 students registered at the time of the meeting.
Board requests and next actions: Members asked administration to supply a board update with (1) the timeline and channels of outreach used for each signature trip (ParentSquare/posts/email/paper), (2) the number of students signed up by grade and by school for each trip, and (3) an administrative plan for how large trips will be coordinated and supported, including options for district facilitation or third‑party travel vendors. Staff said they would report back and that schools would manage trips that did not meet district thresholds this year.
Why it matters: Signature field trips are high‑visibility student experiences that board members said contribute to student engagement and future pathways; members argued the district must ensure equitable access and clear communications so families can plan and save, and so low sign‑up rates do not produce unexpected cancellations.
The board assigned follow‑up reporting and communications details to administration for a future board update.
