Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Facility Maintenance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council tables dehumidifier purchase for fire hall after discussion of vehicle brake corrosion
Summary
Council members heard from a presenter about moisture-related brake and corrosion issues at the fire hall and reviewed dehumidifier options ranging from about $3,000 to $9,591. The purchase is not budgeted; the council tabled the item pending more vendor research and cost comparisons.
The City Council on the floor heard a presentation about recurring moisture problems in the fire hall that council members said have contributed to vehicle brakes sticking and accelerated corrosion. Chris, introduced by the council before speaking, said the issue began with “brakes hanging up after we are out in inclement weather,” and offered several equipment options and price points for removing humidity from the building.
The presenter outlined three options: a contractor-recommended hardwired ceiling unit with a subtotal shown on the estimate of $9,591; off-the-shelf units from manufacturers or distributors in the roughly $2,500–$3,000 range; and a Uline model listed at about $3,000. Chris told the council the higher-priced unit was sized to the building’s cubic footage and would be a heavy-duty, hardwired 220-volt installation, while lower-priced options had differing daily moisture removal capacities and were harder to compare on a like-for-like basis.
Council discussion focused on need, timing, and alternatives. One council member, speaking about urgency and budget timing, said, “I don't really know if we need to spend $9,000 on [a] dehumidifier for the fire department,” noting the item was not budgeted for the year and suggesting the council could wait and include it in next year’s budget. Others argued that ongoing repairs and maintenance tied to moisture—such as seized calipers and rusted components—represented recurring costs that could justify investment. The council also discussed lower-cost interim measures (large commercial fans, additional air movement) and the value of obtaining multiple vendor quotes and warranty information before committing.
Council members referred to prior installations at other city buildings and asked staff to gather more comparable quotes and specifications (pints/day or gallons/day moisture removal rates, warranty details, installation requirements) so the council could compare performance versus price. The council ultimately tabled the dehumidifier item to allow staff to obtain additional proposals and cost comparisons.
Next steps: staff was directed to return with more vendor options, clearer capacity metrics, warranty details and potential state-bid pricing so the council can reassess costs and benefits. No formal purchase or budget amendment was approved at the meeting.
