Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Voting Procedures topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council affirms roll‑call voting preference and discusses order of votes and clerk duties
Summary
Members expressed support for roll-call, tallied votes and debated whether the order of calling votes should follow the motion‑maker and seconder, be rotated, or be left to clerk discretion; clerk duties and roll-call procedures were clarified.
Councilors discussed voting mechanics and meeting operations, including the role of the clerk and the order of speakers when votes are taken.
Members voiced a strong preference for roll-call, tallied voting so the public can see how each member voted. Discussion focused on whether the current practice—calling the person who made the motion, then the seconder, then others, with the presiding officer voting last—should be codified or left flexible. Some suggested rotating the order across agenda items to avoid predictable advantage for any member.
Clerk duties were clarified: council agreed to language stating that the city clerk should attend regular and special meetings and shall call the roll for recording attendance and tallying votes. Members removed conditional phrasing such as "if possible" to make the clerk's responsibilities explicit.
Council did not adopt a fixed rule on vote order; members preferred to test a rotation or allow the clerk to manage the order administratively while keeping the public roll-call requirement in the policy.
