Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Honorary Resolutions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee debates whether county staff or commissioners should sponsor honorary resolutions
Summary
Committee members discussed an upcoming Parks and Recreation honorary resolution and whether honorary or memorial resolutions should require a commissioner sponsor, with some members arguing requiring a sponsor preserves commission control of the agenda.
During new business the Rules Committee discussed an upcoming Parks and Recreation honorary resolution recognizing July as Parks and Recreation Month and whether county staff or departments should be permitted to place honorary resolutions on the commission agenda without a commissioner sponsor.
Several members argued best practice is requiring a commissioner sponsor or chair approval so the commission controls its own agenda; one speaker said requiring a sponsor gives commissioners more ownership of matters placed before the body. Others noted that longstanding practice has allowed the mayor's office and county departments to place ceremonial items on the agenda and that it has rarely been a problem.
What happened: The discussion did not result in a formal vote; members agreed the topic can be revisited if it becomes an operational problem. The committee noted the item from Parks and Rec had been added for the coming month and that chair approval had been used in this instance.
Next steps: Staff and the law department may review whether to draft a rule requiring commissioner sponsorship for agenda items, but the committee left current practice unchanged pending further discussion.
