Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Stormwater topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Library requests permission to bore into street to relieve chronic water; council asks for legal agreement
Summary
The Fort Branch library director asked the council for permission to bore the street to tie into a storm drain to stop flooding at the library entrance; the council said it would review a lawyer‑drafted agreement and the design before final approval and suggested exploring grant help for costs.
Get email alerts on the Stormwater topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Laura Hoppy, identified in the meeting as the library director, told the council the library is experiencing persistent water on the street that risks ice and interior flooding. She said architects and two engineering firms unanimously recommended boring to the storm drain at Church and Locust to remove the water rather than repeatedly patching the surface.
Hoppy asked the council for permission to bore beneath the street to tie into the storm drain and proposed legal protections: a formal agreement spelling out who is responsible for maintenance, indemnification if the bored connection fails, and a provision that the agreement would supersede any future ordinance that might otherwise prevent the work. She also asked whether a check valve could be installed so, in a drain failure, runoff would go to the street instead of into the library.
Councilors and staff expressed a willingness to consider the proposal and asked the library to send the draft agreement and design documents to council members for review before any action. Town staff said engineering maps exist and that 811 and engineering studies would be used to locate subsurface utilities before boring. Councilors also said they could explore grant opportunities to help with cost sharing but cautioned the town’s budget is constrained.
The library introduced board members present at the meeting (Deb Nichols, Rebecca Liam, Ted Hall, Dave Franker and Crystal) and indicated it would provide more precise cost estimates and the draft agreement prior to a future meeting.
The council did not adopt a formal ordinance or binding contract at the meeting; it asked staff to review the proposed agreement and designs and to place the matter on a future agenda once documentation is available.

