Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning Fence Variance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves taller corner-lot privacy fence at 208 Eda Avenue

Harrison Board of Zoning Appeals · June 23, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Harrison Board of Zoning Appeals granted a variance June 23 to allow a solid privacy fence at 208 Eda Avenue to match the existing on-site top height (noted in the record as 80 inches), exceeding the 72-inch front-yard limit. The vote was unanimous.

The Harrison Board of Zoning Appeals on June 23 approved a variance allowing a corner-lot privacy fence at 208 Eda Avenue to exceed the city's 72-inch front-yard height limit to match the existing top elevation on site.

Anthony Hill, who said he owns the corner property and was sworn for testimony, told the board his yard is roughly two feet higher than neighboring yards and that an in-ground pool and grading make the top-of-fence height consistent around the property. He said he planned to replace the existing fence in the same location and presented a petition of neighbor signatures in support.

"My yard literally is 2 foot if not more higher than my neighbors' yards," Hill told the board, adding that the fence sections were installed to account for grade and that he intended to replace the panels "exactly" as they exist but in better condition.

Board members asked about perimeter ownership and setback concerns. A member who visited the site said the height itself was not problematic but noted that very small setbacks (one to two feet) can become overgrown and difficult to maintain. Hill said he would be willing to consider moving the fence back "a foot, foot and a half" if that helped with landscaping.

Mr. Ross moved to approve the variance as submitted; Mr. Cox seconded. Board members Sunny Ross, Bob Cox and Wilson Montgomery voted in favor by voice vote, and the motion carried.

The variance approval permits the applicant to replace the fence in the existing location with a top height the board recorded in the file as 80 inches, above the 72-inch limit cited in the meeting. The board did not record additional conditions or a formal requirement to relocate the fence, though members discussed maintenance and potential overgrowth at small setbacks.

With the vote complete the board moved on to a second case and later adjourned.