Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council hears heated debate over Fuller Station utility variance; staff recommends denial
Summary
Smith Douglas Homes asked Loganville council to allow sewer cleanouts and some water meters within driveways at the Fuller Station townhome project, arguing relocation would be costly and delay construction. City staff cited precedent and utility consistency concerns and recommended denial; council deferred a vote to Thursday.
Smith Douglas Homes representatives presented a request at the Aug. 11 Loganville work session to permit sewer cleanouts and water meters within private driveways at the Fuller Station townhome project.
Carl Enerley, associate general counsel for Smith Douglas Homes, told the council the developer must proceed with three-bedroom townhome plans and that relocating sewer laterals now would require tearing up recently improved public roadways at considerable cost and delay. He described the petition as an administrative modification permitted in “extenuating circumstances” under city utility standards and offered to supply as-built documentation as construction progresses.
City utilities staff, represented in the hearing by Brandon (utilities), pushed back. Staff said previous redesigns of the project had located laterals for two-bedroom layouts and that allowing the requested drive‑in cleanouts would set a precedent they do not want to adopt citywide. The staff report recommended denial and emphasized risks to long-term consistency and future maintenance burdens on homeowners.
Why it matters: The vote affects how utilities are installed and who will bear long-term maintenance and repair responsibility. At issue are homeowner liability if the city must later open driveways to access lines, precedent concerns across Loganville and the cost/engineering tradeoffs of reworking installed mains.
What council members said: Several councilmembers expressed frustration at repeated plan changes and questioned why the developer could not pursue two-bedroom units (a design the prior plat accommodated). Others acknowledged the expense of retrofitting utilities already in the ground. One councilmember called homeowners being responsible for future driveway cuts a “lousy solution,” voicing concern about downstream buyer complaints. Staff and legal counsel reiterated that allowing the variance would be inconsistent with current city standards except in limited, documented cases.
Next steps: Councilmembers asked for a full vote on the variance request at the Thursday meeting; staff indicated they will leave the item off consent and prepare the denial recommendation for that vote.
