Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Industrial Infill topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ares Industries seeks smaller expansion at 576 Elizabeth; staff recommends screening and solid fencing

Waukesha City Plan Commission · March 25, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Ares Industries presented a 7,500-square-foot addition at 576 Elizabeth Street to support a drive-through assembly line; staff recommended combining parcels or recording cross-access easements, adding solid fencing rather than chain link with slats, and addressing parking and sprinkler requirements.

The Plan Commission heard a consultation from staff and Ares Industries (represented by Berg Management) for a proposed roughly 7,500-square-foot addition at 576 Elizabeth Street that would accommodate a one-way assembly line and restore a portion of a previously demolished building.

Staff noted the Board of Zoning Appeals earlier granted a variance to rebuild at the property line and recommended either combining the property with the adjacent parcel (550 Elizabeth) or recording a cross-access easement. The proposed work includes repaving a deteriorated parking lot, adding about seven new parking stalls on the west side, creating a secure parking area in the southwest corner and improving perimeter landscaping. Staff preferred a solid fence rather than chain-link with privacy slats, citing long-term durability concerns.

Applicant representative Mark Rellinger (Berg Management) said clearestory windows are not possible on the railroad-facing wall because of a two-hour fire barrier, that color-matching and landscaping options are under consideration, and that he is open to alternative screening and materials. The fire department also advised that a sprinkler system will likely be required for the addition and the applicant acknowledged that requirement.

Because this was a consultation, no action was taken. Staff requested feedback on facade treatment, parking re-striping and fence types; commissioners generally supported repaving and screening improvements and encouraged the applicant to return with formal plans that address staff comments and the cross-access/parcel-combination question.