Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kootenai County faces multi‑million dollar FY27 shortfall as commissioners weigh freezes, cuts and a 3% tax option
Summary
At a June 23 public meeting, Kootenai County officials reviewed FY27 scenarios that leave the county $2.3 million short under a 3% tax increase and discussed freezing regrades, trimming non‑capital requests and using fund balance for one‑time items as they seek solutions.
Kootenai County commissioners convened June 23 to continue FY27 budget deliberations and heard staff say the county remains in a multi‑million dollar shortfall even with modest tax increases.
“Currently at a 3% tax increase, we still have a budget deficit of $2.3 million,” Brandy Falcon told the board as she opened the operating budget briefing. Falcon outlined alternative scenarios: a $3.0 million deficit at a 2% increase, $3.7 million at 1% and $4.3 million with no tax increase.
The board and staff identified personnel step increases, expanding ongoing costs for health insurance and the sheriff’s office as primary drivers of that pressure. Falcon said the prorated cost to fund anniversary step increases for FY27 would be about $703,000 and would raise the FY28 baseline by roughly $1.4 million.
Commissioners moved to mark several requested regrades and smaller personnel increases as cuts for this year. The DMV manager and a sheriff’s admin/personnel regrade were specifically discussed and were marked as budget cuts for FY27 pending additional review.
Faced with persistent deficits, commissioners focused on a portfolio of approaches: asking elected officials to make deeper cuts to their A and B budgets, using one‑time interest or fund balance for capital or short‑term needs, and deferring or freezing some ongoing reclassifications and purchases. Falcon presented a recommended cuts list of 53 line items across departments, estimated to free roughly $342,000 if adopted.
Several department requests were paused or held as placeholders while staff and elected officials pursue larger reductions. The board agreed to reconvene after a recess to continue A‑side deliberations and requested supporting documentation for major changes, including sheriff overtime projections and IT cost estimates.
The meeting recessed for lunch with the board scheduled to return at 1:00 p.m. to continue budget work.
