Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Developer presents sketch plans for large age‑restricted complexes on West Chester Pike; Commission flags zoning conflicts

Willistown Township Planning Commission · May 20, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

HOW Properties presented two sketch plans for 5214 West Chester Pike — one proposal for a six‑story building with 95 units and 22 townhomes and another for two six‑story buildings totaling 150 units — and the Planning Commission said the proposals conflict with current RU and PHC district rules; residents raised traffic, slope and sewer concerns.

John Pack of HOW Properties Acquisitions presented two sketch plans concurrently on May 20 for 5214 West Chester Pike. The first proposed a single six‑story age‑restricted apartment building with 95 units, ground‑floor commercial space and 22 townhomes; the second proposed two six‑story age‑restricted buildings totaling 150 units with ground‑floor commercial space.

Pack said these were initial concepts and he sought feedback. Planning Commission members said the proposals raised numerous issues, including that the Township’s current ordinances do not permit this type or scale of development in the RU or PHC districts. Commissioners discussed historic timing of PHC provisions and whether a different type of development would be acceptable at that location.

Several residents commented. Kevin Clark of 119 Weatherburn Wy said he feared increased traffic and said he valued the current open space. Tim Frey of 109 Weatherburn Wy expressed support for the RU regulations that preserve lower density. Ed Molony, a representative of the Plumsock HOA, said he expected the community would not approve a connection into their sewer system. Ann Mezger of 3 Fairmont Dr raised concerns about steep slopes and woodlands. Tom Hatzidais of 301 Freedom Ct noted the proposal included commercial storefronts and said some development appeared motivated by profit.

Mr. Pack said he would take the Commission’s feedback back to his team and rethink the project details. No formal action was taken at the meeting.